Disclaimer
ADVERTISING MATERIAL www.boselaw.com/disclaimerRSS
Authors
-
-
Recent Posts
Tags
Advertising Injury Affordable Care Act alternative fee agreements Anonymous Speech Antitrust Appeals application developers Apps Arbitration attorney discipline attorney misconduct attorneys' fees Bose McKinney & Evans California California's Online Privacy Protection Act Class Actions Commercial Lines Policy Copyright Defamation developers Discovery Domain Name Duty to Defend E-Discovery Eleventh Circuit employee Evidence Experts Expert Witnesses Federal Arbitration Act Federal Courts Federal Practice Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Fifth Circuit First Amendment Forum non Conveniens Free Speech Health Care Reform Indiana Indiana Court of Appeals Indiana Supreme Court Insurance Intellectual Property Internet Law Journalist's Privilege Jurisdiction JVCA legislation life insurance Limitations Litigation Media Law Newsgathering New York Non-parties privacy penalities professional responsibility protecting online consumers Protect IP regulation of lawyers Removal Res Judicata Sam Laurin Second Circuit SOPA Spoliation Summary Judgment Supreme Court Technology The Indiana Lawyer Third Circuit UDRP university Venue web operatorsCategories
Archives
- December 2016
- May 2016
- January 2016
- January 2015
- May 2014
- February 2014
- November 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- July 2011
Monthly Archives: December 2011
Trade secret lawsuit filed over employee’s social media account
A recent New York Times article covers a lawsuit filed by PhoneDog, a mobile products research and review company, against one of its former employees. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/26/technology/lawsuit-may-determine-who-owns-a-twitter-account.html?_r=1&scp=1&sq=PhoneDog&st=cse In November 2011, the Chief Judge of the Northern District of California decided that the … Continue reading
Posted in Intellectual Property
Leave a comment
New Model Order Aims to Rein In Expense of E-Discovery
As many have learned, the expense of pursuing electronic discovery can drive the outcome of a lawsuit to a greater extent than the merits of a case. So what can be done to get e-discovery costs in check and refocus … Continue reading
Indiana Lawyers’ Alternative Fee Arrangements: When Is A Deal A Deal?
A deal is a deal, right? That is not always true when the deal is a fee agreement between a lawyer and a client. With interest in alternative fee arrangements growing among lawyers and clients, Indiana law firms should keep … Continue reading
Protect IP and SOPA Approach the Starting Line
In the last day, Sen. Harry Reid has said there will be a vote in the Senate on the Preventing Real Online Threats to Economic Creativity and Theft of Intellectual Property (Protect IP) act on January 24. In the last hour there have been reports … Continue reading
Posted in Copyright, Intellectual Property
Tagged Copyright, Intellectual Property, Protect IP, SOPA
1 Comment
The Indiana Senate Attempts to Abolish the American Rule
The general policy under American civil law is that all litigants must bear their own attorneys’ fees (including the prevailing party). American lawyers creatively coined this as the “American Rule.” The American Rule is subject to certain bad-faith, statutory, and … Continue reading
Authors v. Google Enters the Next Stage
The Authors Guild, Inc. et al. v. Google, Inc., 1:05-cv-08136-DC (S.D.N.Y.), began almost 7 years ago when Google’s “Library Project” results were first available online. The lawsuit has just entered a new stage which you would expect at the beginning–a motion for … Continue reading
Posted in Class Actions, Copyright, Intellectual Property
Tagged Class Actions, Copyright, Intellectual Property
1 Comment
Indiana Court of Appeals Thwarts Non-Party Discovery in Out-of-State Arbitration
Getting discovery from non-parties can be a tricky proposition, particularly when the discovery is being sought as part of an out-of-state arbitration. Equally tricky is resisting discovery if you’re that non-party. The Indiana Court of Appeals recently provided some protection … Continue reading
Posted in Arbitration, Discovery, Discovery from Non-Parties
Tagged Arbitration, Discovery, Indiana, Non-parties
Leave a comment
