Tag Archives: Duty to Defend

Courts Rebuff Policyholders Who Seek Defense of Antitrust Class Actions

Recently-filed lawsuits in California and Georgia follow a trend of CGL policyholders demanding defenses to antitrust conspiracy claims under the theory that the antitrust class actions seek damages for “personal and advertising injury.” The same playbook, however, has not succeeded … Continue reading

Posted in Advertising Injury, Class Actions, Coverage Disputes, Intentional Misconduct | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment