Disclaimer
ADVERTISING MATERIAL www.boselaw.com/disclaimerRSS
Authors
-
Recent Posts
Tags
- Advertising Injury
- Affordable Care Act
- alternative fee agreements
- Anonymous Speech
- Antitrust
- Appeals
- application developers
- Apps
- Arbitration
- attorney discipline
- attorney misconduct
- attorneys' fees
- Bose McKinney & Evans
- California
- California's Online Privacy Protection Act
- Class Actions
- Commercial Lines Policy
- Copyright
- Defamation
- developers
- Discovery
- Domain Name
- Duty to Defend
- E-Discovery
- Eleventh Circuit
- employee
- Evidence
- Experts
- Expert Witnesses
- Federal Arbitration Act
- Federal Courts
- Federal Practice
- Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
- Fifth Circuit
- First Amendment
- Forum non Conveniens
- Free Speech
- Health Care Reform
- Indiana
- Indiana Court of Appeals
- Indiana Supreme Court
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Internet Law
- Journalist's Privilege
- Jurisdiction
- JVCA
- legislation
- life insurance
- Limitations
- Litigation
- Media Law
- Newsgathering
- New York
- Non-parties
- privacy penalities
- professional responsibility
- protecting online consumers
- Protect IP
- regulation of lawyers
- Removal
- Res Judicata
- Sam Laurin
- Second Circuit
- SOPA
- Spoliation
- Summary Judgment
- Supreme Court
- Technology
- The Indiana Lawyer
- Third Circuit
- UDRP
- university
- Venue
- web operators
Categories
Archives
- December 2016
- May 2016
- January 2016
- January 2015
- May 2014
- February 2014
- November 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- July 2011
Tag Archives: Removal
SCOTUS Unanimously Rules that Class Action Plaintiffs Can’t Stipulate Their Way Out of Federal Court Jurisdiction
Plaintiffs’ lawyers will need to get more creative if they want to keep class actions in state court. Today, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled unanimously that class action plaintiffs can’t avoid the Class Action Fairness Act’s amount-in-controversy … Continue reading
Posted in Class Actions, Jurisdiction, Removal
Tagged Class Actions, Federal Practice, Jurisdiction, Removal
Leave a comment
Happy JVCA Day!
As we previously wrote about here and here, the Juridiction Venue and Clarification Act of 2011 goes into effect today. Also on this day in history: Joan of Arc was born, Samuel Morse demo-ed the telegraph, New Mexico became a … Continue reading
Posted in Federal Practice, Jurisdiction, Removal, Venue
Tagged Federal Practice, Jurisdiction, JVCA, Removal, Venue
Leave a comment
Update: President Signs JVCA
On December 7, 2011, President Obama signed the Jurisidiction and Venue Clarification Act of 2011. The JVCA takes effect 30 days after signing, so a new era of federal court practice begins on January 6, 2012. See our previous report … Continue reading
Posted in Federal Practice, Jurisdiction, Removal, Venue
Tagged Federal Practice, Jurisdiction, JVCA, Removal, Venue
1 Comment
Major Changes Are Coming to Federal Venue and Removal Practice
Throw away those dusty Civ Pro outlines! Thanks to the Jurisdiction and Venue Clarification Act of 2011–which passed the Senate on November 30 and which the President is expected to sign–major changes to federal court practice are coming: The “rule … Continue reading
Posted in Federal Practice, Jurisdiction, Removal, Venue
Tagged Federal Practice, Jurisdiction, Removal, Venue
2 Comments